I could be mistaken, but I believe in the olden days, we did refer, at times, to the pound sign as a hash mark. Seems I recall your Granddad calling it that, unless it was some other symbol...
Sounds like a felony to me.
On second thought, it may be "hatch" mark that we say.
Mom - I think the 'correct' term is 'hatch' but it comes out as 'hash' because people mis-hear it and then repeat the mistake.As for the pound symbol, that would be £ (as in the British currency) since 'lb' is an abbreviation, rather than a symbol.
Yes, there is that, too. We definitely do say "pound" for "#" though!
Do you use # as a symbol to mean the weight? In which case it would make sense for you to call it 'pound'.
Nooo, we don't ... would have made sense, though!
Yes, we do use # to mean pound, as in weight. For example a 5# bag of potatoes.
Post a Comment
8 comments:
I could be mistaken, but I believe in the olden days, we did refer, at times, to the pound sign as a hash mark. Seems I recall your Granddad calling it that, unless it was some other symbol...
Sounds like a felony to me.
On second thought, it may be "hatch" mark that we say.
Mom - I think the 'correct' term is 'hatch' but it comes out as 'hash' because people mis-hear it and then repeat the mistake.
As for the pound symbol, that would be £ (as in the British currency) since 'lb' is an abbreviation, rather than a symbol.
Yes, there is that, too. We definitely do say "pound" for "#" though!
Do you use # as a symbol to mean the weight? In which case it would make sense for you to call it 'pound'.
Nooo, we don't ... would have made sense, though!
Yes, we do use # to mean pound, as in weight. For example a 5# bag of potatoes.
Post a Comment